Changing the delivery of IT

Tony Bishop

Subscribe to Tony Bishop: eMailAlertsEmail Alerts
Get Tony Bishop: homepageHomepage mobileMobile rssRSS facebookFacebook twitterTwitter linkedinLinkedIn


Zoho Claims Google Was Salesforce's Second Choice

Zoho's Resident Blogger Sridhar Vembu Mentioned In His Blog That Benioff, Salesforce's CEO, Had Tried To Buy Zoho

There might have been no industry-tingling Google-Salesforce alliance the other day if Zoho had accepted any of Marc Benioff’s “repeated” offers to buy Zoho outright a few months ago.

Zoho’s resident blogger and CEO of its parent company AdventNet, Sridhar Vembu, was dumping on Salesforce – an understandable exercise since Zoho’s stash of SaaS Office-wannabe productivity programs includes a Salesforce rival CRM module – when he happened to mention that Benioff, Salesforce’s CEO, had tried to buy Zoho.

Benioff likes to position Microsoft as old-fashioned and passé.

Vembu uses the same dictionary when talking about Salesforce.

He claims Benioff has little comprehension of the value of an open ecosystem and is “still playing a 1990s software game, with expensive software (sorry, software-as-a-service!) and a business model that is sure to make Larry Ellison flinch, which is saying something.”

He produced a spreadsheet using data from Google Finance that shows that Salesforce is spending nearly eight times on sales and marketing that it does on R&D, which Vembu calls “business model bloat” and an “evolutionary dead-end.”

Then he tells the following story, assuring readers he is not under NDA:

“Several months ago,” he says, “ invited us to participate in their AppExchange ecosystem. They knew of our Zoho CRM competition (which is why it was mutually agreed than an NDA was inappropriate), but the AppExchanage folks thought it was still good for their ecosystem. We agreed that it would be good for both of us, so we worked on making Zoho work with AppExchange, with their help & support. We invested in R&D to make the integration work, and we were about a week from launch, when Marc Benioff decided to pull the plug. He invited me for discussions. He offered repeatedly to acquire Zoho outright, which we rejected. I told him there is absolutely no fit between our companies, particularly with his business model (as noted above) and our business model. I told him there is just no cultural fit between our companies and such an acquisition would be miserable for both parties. Finally, he offered to let us integrate Zoho into AppExchange, provided we pull the plug on Zoho CRM. We told him that kind of pre-condition is totally unacceptable, and it also completely negates his claims of openness of their platform. Needless to say, we never did agree on the issue, and we dropped the integration effort.”

He claims the integration of Google and Salesforce – for all the speculation about Google buying Salesforce – won’t last because the business models are so different.

On Wednesday, to compete against saleforce, Zoho upgraded its CRM module and came up with an “affordable” Enterprise Edition for medium to large companies. It apparently adds role-based security administration, multi-language support, SSL support and integration with Zoho’s spreadsheet.

A Personal Edition is free, a Professional Edition is $12 a user a month and the Enterprise Edition is $25 a user a month. Both Professional and Enterprise are free to the first three users.


More Stories By Maureen O'Gara

Maureen O'Gara the most read technology reporter for the past 20 years, is the Cloud Computing and Virtualization News Desk editor of SYS-CON Media. She is the publisher of famous "Billygrams" and the editor-in-chief of "Client/Server News" for more than a decade. One of the most respected technology reporters in the business, Maureen can be reached by email at maureen(at) or paperboy(at), and by phone at 516 759-7025. Twitter: @MaureenOGara

Comments (0)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.